Blog

Insights

A Different Kind of Power – Jacinda Ardern

Steven Asnicar

Steven Asnicar

Jacinda Ardern’s new book, “A Different Kind of Power,” is not a conventional political memoir. Instead of a detailed policy-by-policy account, it’s a deeply personal exploration of how her life experiences shaped her leadership philosophy, with a strong focus on empathy. The book makes a compelling case that kindness and emotional intelligence are not weaknesses but essential tools for effective leadership, particularly in times of crisis.

Unfortunately its’s not what we are seeing in many World leaders today who are driven be corruption and power rather than the need to do the right things and make the hard decisions for humanity. 

The Book:  “A Different Kind of Power”
Ardern’s memoir stands out for its candid and human-centered approach. She dedicates a significant portion of the book to her upbringing, early life, and formative experiences, such as her work with the Labour Party and the tragic death of a close friend. This narrative style gives readers a unique window into the genesis of her political ideology and leadership style. She aims to show that a leader’s character is forged long before they enter the public spotlight.

The book re-examines some of the most challenging periods of her tenure, including the Christchurch mosque terror attack, the Whakaari/White Island volcanic eruption, and the COVID-19 pandemic. In these sections, Ardern emphasizes the power of compassionate communication and a human-first response. She shares the internal struggles of juggling the demands of motherhood with the pressures of being a world leader, a relatable vulnerability that many working parents, particularly mothers, can connect with.

Critics note that while the book is a poignant and refreshing read, it intentionally avoids a deep dive into the political and policy intricacies of her time in office. This focus on the personal over the political may leave some readers wanting a more detailed account of her government’s decisions. However, this is precisely the point of the book: it is meant to be a different kind of memoir that centers on the why of leadership, rather than the what. Ardern’s storytelling makes a strong case that her empathetic approach was not a mere stylistic choice but a fundamental part of her success.

Recommendation on the Importance of Empathetic Leadership
Jacinda Ardern’s book serves as a timely and important reminder of why empathetic leadership is more critical than ever. In a world characterized by polarization and complexity, the ability to connect with and understand others’ emotions is no longer a “soft skill” but a core competency for effective leaders.  

Empathetic leadership fosters trust, improves communication, and builds a more inclusive and resilient organization. Research shows that empathetic leaders create a sense of psychological safety, which in turn leads to higher employee engagement, increased innovation, and better retention. In politics, empathy can help bridge divides, facilitate conflict resolution, and build public trust in institutions.

Ardern’s leadership during crises demonstrated that empathy can be a powerful tool for a unified response. Her ability to articulate a shared sense of grief after the Christchurch attack, and to guide her nation with calm and compassion during the pandemic, offered a stark contrast to the “strongman” style of leadership often seen on the global stage. Her book powerfully argues that this “different kind of power” one rooted in vulnerability and care is a more sustainable and impactful model for navigating the challenges of the 21st century.

For aspiring leaders in any field, Ardern’s book is an essential read. It encourages us to discard the notion that leaders must be stoic or infallible. Instead, it posits that the things we often see as flaws sensitivity, anxiety, and a tendency to worry can be transformed into strengths, giving us the courage to lead with empathy, conviction, and a truly human heart.

What’s really sad is that many people judge her empathetic leadership as a weakness when what they should be seeing is that it was her key strength.